Posts Tagged ‘HTC’

Do cell phones cause brain cancer, dementia or have other side effects? Though there have been numerous studies on this, the verdict remains unclear. For, some studies reveal long-term side effects of cell phone usage others term them as mere hype. However, it is largely certain that cell phones do emit radiation. In fact, some analysts are now of the view that all cell phones should compulsorily display their radiation levels. Recently one of the US-based environmental group EWG recently published a list of phones with high levels of RF radiation. The list includes some of the most popular smartphone models from companies like Apple, LG, HTC, Motorola, Blackberry and Samsung.

The study is based on SAR or Specific Absorption Rate. SAR according to the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association is “a way of measuring the quantity of radio frequency (RF) energy that is absorbed by the body, (SAR is used to measure exposure to fields between 100 kHz and 10 GHz), as per standards it requires that phones sold have a SAR level at or below 1.5 watts per kilogram (W/kg) taken over a volume of 1 gram of tissue.. Here’s a quick view of that EWG list of the phones with high radiation levels and there SAR levels, in this week of my blog episode :

Motorola Droid

null

Maximum radiation: Wireless 1.50 W/kg
SAR when held at the ear: 1.49 W/kg
SAR when worn on the body: 1.50 W/kg

Apple iPhone 3G S

null

Maximum radiation: 1.19 W/kg
SAR when held at the ear: 0.63 W/kg
SAR when worn on the body: 0.52 W/kg (GSM 850 Mode)

HTC Nexus One

null

Maximum radiation: 1.39 W/kg All models/modes
SAR when held at the ear: 0.87 W/kg
SAR when worn on the body: 1.39 W/kg

Blackberry Bold 9700

null

Maximum radiation: 1.55 W/kg
SAR when held at the ear: 1.55 W/kg
SAR when worn on the body: 0.77 W/kg

Samsung Instinct HD

null

Maximum radiation: 1.16 W/kg
SAR when held at the ear: 1.16 W/kg
SAR when worn on the body: 0.71 W/kg

Motorola Cliq

null

Maximum radiation: 1.10 W/kg
SAR when held at the ear: 0.69 W/kg
SAR when worn on the body: 1.10 W/kg

Motorola Brute i680

null

Maximum radiation: 0.86 W/kg
SAR when held at the ear: 0.59 W/kg
SAR when worn on the body: 0.86 W/kg

Pantech Impact

null

Maximum radiation: 0.92 W/kg
SAR when held at the ear: 0.72 W/kg
SAR when worn on the body: 0.92 W/kg

LG Chocolate Touch

null

Maximum radiation: 1.46 W/kg
SAR when held at the ear 1.46 W/kg
SAR when worn on the body 0.79 W/kg

Samsung Mythic

null

Maximum radiation: 1.08 W/kg
SAR when held at the ear: 0.67 W/kg
SAR when worn on the body: 0.64 W/kg (GSM 1900 Mode)

Everyone is clamoring about tablets these days, then why not Google too, so it’s not too surprising that Google and HTC are set to join the fray. They are reportedly working together on a Chrome OS Google Tablet.

null

With this Apple’s high-profile iPad touchscreen tablet PC may face stiff competition from rivals such as Google, Sony and X2. Google having collaborated on the Nexus One, a smart phone that impressed us with its design as well as its hardware, HTC and Google partnering on a tablet seems like a promising prospect. But will it “compete head on” with Apple’s tablet ? 😉 who knows…

So let take a sneak peak at what it may look like, the developers behind Chromium OS – the open-source project that underpins Google’s Chrome mobile operating system – have revealed concept designs for a tablet PC running on Google Chrome.

The Google Chrome tablet concept designs showcases a range of touchscreen tablet PC features, including:

— A range of touch-screen keypad configurations, including a split keyboard with keys assigned to left and right hands
— Different methods of launching Google Chrome applications
— Tabs presented along the side of the screen of the Google Chrome interface
— Creating multiple Chrome web browsers on screen using a launcher

Also pictures of what a Google tablet might look like were featured at a Chromium developers web page this week along with talk of how touchscreen controls could work based on the Internet titan’s Chrome computer operating system. It primarily comprises shots highlighting the user interface (UI) of a tablet PC. It includes such possibilities as, “keyboard interaction with the screen: anchored, split, attached to focus,” “contextual actions triggered via dwell,” and “zooming UI for multiple tabs.” and primary targeted date for Chrome OS hardware is Q4 2010. Here are some snaps of the Google Tablet concept design…

null

———————————————————————————————————-

null
———————————————————————————————————-

null
———————————————————————————————————-

null

It’s hard to foresee a future in which a Google Tablet tries to go head to head with Apple on the content level. That’s not to say, however, that there aren’t some compelling things that could be offered by a Google tablet. As the launch of Google’s Chrome OS made clear, they’re looking toward a future with a multitude of devices that can access the Internet quickly, cleanly, and cheaply. A Google Tablet could be just the thing to realize all of those goals. If you have tried out the JooJoo tablet, we can see how a well-designed tablet for consuming web content could provide an engaging experience. A Chrome OS tablet by Google would likely work the same way, keeping typing to a minimum and offering a literal hands-on web surfing experience. By far the consumer it’s a tough choice if one thinks of affording a tablet, my choice wait until there is a sync in the tablet world, there would be a better choice for ur need and multiple to choose from within ur budget…;)